Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
| От | Holger Klawitter |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200404131256.15356.lists@klawitter.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images ("Development - multi.art.studio" <dev.null@multiartstudio.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> imho other filesystems like reiser have some version-problems ;)
Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words, both
have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)
In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the original
post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3. That's why I
switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any problems since).
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards
Holger Klawitter
- --
lists <at> klawitter <dot> de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAe8dP1Xdt0HKSwgYRAkLqAJ4vmqkDGkFYDL67aPMAK6qGAavEQgCfekvV
JCht52XAoXE8DrbXX24B8gc=
=XjOz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: