Dave Page wrote:
> It's rumoured that Robert Treat once said:
> >
> > I think the deal is that those in Europe aren't currently subject to
> > software patent litigation even if it violates US law. Further, some
> > of the interpretations of the laws being proposed in Europe are fairly
> > draconian, and could put more cautious open source distributors "out
> > of business" so to speak. check out
> > http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html for some informational
> > links.
>
> Yes, that's about right - in fact the link at the bottom of that page
> leads to the proper Knoppix homepage which mentions even simple common
> features like progress bars and scrollable windows being under threat. The
> problem isn't even whether on not a project actually infringes a patent
> anyway though - just checking whether on not it does can cost a huge
> amount of money, so an unscrupulous corporate could put a project out of
> business with an infringement claim that warrants further investigation,
> whether or not the claim is valid.
> As for the US issue - my understanding is that in the US you can only
> patent complex software processes and concepts, whereas in the EU you will
> be able to patent simple 'things' such as UI controls.
Here is a scarey article talking about patents and generating patent
revenue:
http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5189747.html?tag=nefd.top
Dave is right that just checking on patents can make software
development impossible for all but the largest organization.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073