Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I think the biggest problem is that stdin/stdout in COPY is different
> > from \copy. I propose we make stdin/stdout consistent for COPY and
> > \copy, where stdin always reads from command input, and stdout always
> > writes to command output. This does break backward compatibility of
> > \copy for stdin/stdout; this change would have to be mentioned in the
> > release notes. COPY is unaffected.
>
> > I propose we add 'pstdin', and 'pstdout' to read from psql's stdin and
> > stdout. I think that will greatly simplify our documentation, and
> > clarify the stdin/stdout usage in all cases.
>
> What is "command output" and how does that differ from stdout?
>
> I see the need to distinguish command input from psql stdin, since psql
> may be reading the command from a file, but I don't see where there's
> a stdout difference.
>
> "pstdin" seems a bit contrived; I'm just as happy with using "-" as
> the existing patch did. I'm fine with swapping the meanings to bring
> \copy into line with COPY, though.
pstdout can be illustrated by this:$ sql -f /tmp/x testDROP TABLECREATE TABLEINSERT 17225 11$ sql -f /tmp/x -o /tmp/y
test1
where /tmp/x is:DROP TABLE test;CREATE TABLE test (x int);INSERT INTO test VALUES (1);\copy test to stdout
In this case, stdout is going to psql's stdout, not to the command
stdout.
The reason I didn't like '-' is that it is used mostly in Unix as
synonym for stdin, and in this case it isn't a synonym --- it actually
has different behavior. Using '-' which is a synonym for stdin causes
confusion.
I thought pstdin/pstdout were very clear in helping folks remember how
it is different from stdin/stdout. Certainly it is contrived. Do you
like appstdin and appstdout better, or psqlstdin and psqlstdout?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073