On 31/03/2004 16:40 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jaime Casanova" <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com> writes:
> > There are no indexes yet, and the table is just 6 rows long so even if
> > indexes exists the planner will do a seq scan. that's my whole point
> 63m for
> > seq scan in 6 rows table is too much.
>
> That was 63 milliseconds, according to your original post, which seems
> perfectly reasonable to me seeing that it's not a super-duper server.
>
> The problem sounds to be either on the client side or somewhere in your
> network. I don't know anything about VB, but you might want to look
> through the client-side operations to see what could be eating up the 13
> seconds.
Given that the client and server are on different machines, I'm wondering
the bulk of the 13 seconds is due a network mis-configuration or a very
slow DNS server...
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+