Re: Log rotation
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Log rotation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040324161733.GA16498@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Log rotation (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:55:34AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5 > options: > > . the apache program - see below > pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import > con: possible license issues, limited features One of the folks who works with me at Afilias, Andrew Hammond, is trying to clean up a patch he made to include the apache log rotator "natively". We've been looking at it because I'm worried about the I/O our current approach imposes, and we need to have something to compare it with. I think he told me that he'll have a patch ready to offer in a day or two. Of course, it would depend on actually having the rotator program sitting around somewhere. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: