Re: listening addresses

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Both of these are not always correct - they might well have configured a
> > listening address but we were unable to bind to it, although in that case
> > a warning would have already been issued. To be strictly correct either we
> > need to use a flag to distinguish the these cases, or we need an error
> > message that contemplates both cases.
>
> How about "no socket created for listening" or some such?

Or "no socket available for listening"?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073