Re: listening addresses

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Both of these are not always correct - they might well have configured a
> listening address but we were unable to bind to it, although in that case
> a warning would have already been issued. To be strictly correct either we
> need to use a flag to distinguish the these cases, or we need an error
> message that contemplates both cases.

How about "no socket created for listening" or some such?

            regards, tom lane