Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
| От | Jeroen T. Vermeulen |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20040312145554.GS39391@xs4all.nl обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:42:47PM -0000, Dave Page wrote: > > We need some distinction between the core project sites and other > project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that. Okay, then how about postgres-extra.net, or forpostgres.net? Saying Postgres instead of PostgreSQL takes out a bit of that extra length and it's lots easier to pronounce. We've been through this whole what- shall-we-call-it thing months ago and IIRC the upshot was that the short version of the name is perfectly acceptable and much catchier. Here's a chance to use it! Even shorter and catchier would be "pgprojects.net" IMHO, but that again stretches the connection with PostgreSQL. Jeroen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: