Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (It might be good if we had a more standardized way of generating
> >> HISTORY though. I tried a couple different versions of lynx and
> >> got a couple different outputs, none perfectly matching whatever
> >> version Bruce is using ...)
>
> > Is this something that could be added to the 'make dist' target, so that
> > it happens as part of the bundle build?
>
> Not a bad idea. AFAICS we have the generation of HISTORY down to a
> script now; there's no reason for it to be in CVS at all. It'd be nice
> to do the same for INSTALL, but I'm not sure if that takes any manual
> twiddling or not. (Peter?)
INSTALL pulls the release number from configure.in, or configure.
> The version of lynx that's on cvs.postgresql.org seems to produce okay
> output (it's what I ended up using yesterday), so standardizing on that
> wouldn't be a problem.
I have:
Lynx Version 2.8.3rel.1 (23 Apr 2000)Built on bsdi4.3 Jun 5 2001 12:07:55
and I see postgresql.org has:
Lynx Version 2.8.5dev.16 (01 Jun 2003)libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.7bBuilt on freebsd4.8 Sep 1 2003
04:28:28
The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have
an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release.
Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball
packaging, and INSTALL too.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073