Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Nope, not for those items. There is still some thought of a very short
> > release cycle (a few months) for 7.5, and we could possibly address the
> > vacuum issue in that timeframe, if the recent ideas about it prove out.
> > But there is no consensus on how to fix the integer-index issues, and
> > I'm not willing to hold 7.4 (or even 7.5) hostage to finding one.
>
> The idea of very short release cycle for 7.5 is interesting. What is
> the core's decision for point-in-time-recovery? Maybe the decision is
> 7.5 does not include point-in-time-recovery?
I believe we were thinking PITR or Win32, or both could trigger a short
7.5 release cycle. However, it doesn't seem either is ready.
If we do a short cycle, will we have enough features to justify a
release? We could try to get PITR and Win32 done by January 1 and see
if that can happen.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073