Re: Unicode upper() bug still present

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> (Note that I say Unicode a lot here because those people do a lot of
> research and standardization in this area, which is available for free,
> but this does not constrain the result to work only with the Unicode
> character set.)
Why  cannot  do PostgreSQL  as  100%  pure  Unicode system? We  can  doconversion  from/to  others  encodings as
client/server communicationextension, but  internaly in BE  we can  use only pure  Unicode data. Ithink a lot of things
willmore simple...
 
   Karel

-- Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/