On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:31:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Agreed. Patch applied. I was confused because the original posted URL
> mentioned unions, which was a different alignment issue from just
> structure pointer compatibility.
In the article Andrew mentioned, it is said that the unions thingie is a
GCC extension for solving the problem, thus unportable.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"If it wasn't for my companion, I believe I'd be having
the time of my life" (John Dunbar)