Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:
> >> Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
> >> nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
> >> in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
> >> cost us CVS storage forever.
>
> > Um, why not just have someone with local CVSROOT access just rm -f the
> > ,v file when the WIN32_DEV branch ceases to be useful?
>
> If we do that, we will lose the change histories from back when those
> files were kept in CVS (five or more years ago). Perhaps this is not
> important, but I'm hesitant to do it.
Right. I assume branches are kept in the same file as HEAD.
I have decided not to regularly update the derived files in WIN32_DEV
--- I will just keep the files in their place, and have configure
'touch' them to make them more recent when configure is run --- we are
just trying to get the backend to start at this point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073