Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>
> --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian
> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>
> > Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >> > From UnixWare:
> >>
> >> $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl
> >> UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 60: argument #3 incompatible
> >> with prototype: pthread_create()
> >> UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 61: argument #3 incompatible
> >> with prototype: pthread_create()
> >> $ ./test_thread
> >> Your functions are all thread-safe
> >> $
> >
> > Well, that's great news, and so clear too!
> >
> > I am curious about the compiler warnings.
> >
> > What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I
> > thought a void pointer would be OK for everyone:
> >
> > pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void *) func_call_1, NULL);
>
> void *(*start_routine)(void*)
>
> Here is our man page:
> http://lerami.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.3pthread/pthread_create.3pthread.
> html
Yes, that's what I have too. What if you have the functions taking
(void *) rather than void. Does that make the warnings disappear?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073