Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
> > thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
> > such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
>
> Long shot ... is there some way of writing a configure test for this?
> Right now, it sounds like we're going to be hitting alot of trial-n-error
> if there isn't ...
How would we test if a function is thread-safe? I can't think of a
reliable way, and hence my warning that this adjusting could take a
while.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073