On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to
> > be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything
> > over a couple of thousand values.
>
> Changed to do what?
One possibility might be to act as if the valuelist was a table and do the
IN as if it were that way, rather than treating it as a set of ORs. That
would be basically like doing the temporary table solution, but without
requiring the user to do it.