On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:41, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > > Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to
> > > be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything
> > > over a couple of thousand values.
> >
> > Changed to do what?
>
> One possibility might be to act as if the valuelist was a table and do the
> IN as if it were that way, rather than treating it as a set of ORs. That
> would be basically like doing the temporary table solution, but without
> requiring the user to do it.
Is the temp table version any faster? I realize it has a higher limit
to the number of items you can have in the list.