> >> (2) It's in our interest if things like the Queue/ShMem stuff
> >> is part of pgsql as it means one less of a merge hassle in
> >> future.
>
> Sean> I'd be quite interested in the work as it would remove my
> Sean> dependence on jabberd as a distributed event/message bus and
> Sean> I could keep everything inside of PostgreSQL, which is
> Sean> always a good thing. :) -sc
>
> Sounds great ! Would it make more sense for us to correspond privately
> and see if you can use our code and then submit a patch ?
>
> Or is it better to have a discussion on HACKERS itself and lend itself
> to further googling.
Do you have a URL for the patch? If not, send it to me privately. I
can take any non-critical issues off line but I bet others have an
interest in this code as well.
I'm particularly interested in the API atm to see how hard it would be
to integrate. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden