Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Also, there is a special HPUX 9 configure test to look for rint() a
> > different location. I am not sure if the new replacement rint() test
> > has invalidated that code. Do we still support HPUX 9? (I added a
> > comment to the configure script to mention it might now be broken.)
>
> HPUX 9 is obsolete (heck, HP is about to obsolete HPUX 10...). If
> there's any beta testers out there still running it, they can find out
> for us. But I'd say that if you are providing a portable rint() in
> /port, we could get rid of the HPUXMATHLIB crock and let configure
> fall back to using the /port version.
OK, removed.
> > I see a cbrt() in float.c. Do we actually have platforms that don't
> > have cbrt()/cube root? I am inclined to remove it more move it to
> > /port.
>
> Hardly worth the trouble. The substitute implementation is small
> and portable...
Sorry, my paragraph was bad. Should I remove cbrt or move it to /port?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073