Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Тема Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Дата
Msg-id 200305030357.54875.darcy@druid.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Friday 02 May 2003 16:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> More disks is almost always better.  Putting WAL on a seperate (non-RAID)
> disk is usually a very good idea.

From a performance POV perhaps.  The subject came up on hackers recently and
it was pointed out that if you use RAID for reliability and redundancy rather
than for performance, you need to keep the WAL files on the RAID too.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Becky Neville
Дата:
Сообщение: NOT IN doesn't use index?
Следующее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)