Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
| От | Andrew Sullivan | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030401175519.GA9553@mail обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 ("Jeffrey D. Brower" <jeff@pointhere.net>) | 
| Ответы | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:33:15PM -0500, Jeffrey D. Brower wrote:
> What is the URL of that article?  I understood that ext2 was faster with PG
> and so I went to a lot of trouble of creating an ext2 partition just for PG
> and gave up the journalling to do that.  Something about double effort since
> PG already does a lot of that.
I don't know how ext3 could be faster than ext2, since it has to do
more work.
But ext2 is not crash-safe.  So your data could well be hosed if you
come back from a crash on ext2.
Actually, I have my doubts about _any_ of the journaling filesystems
for Linux: ext3 has a reputation for being slow if you journal in the
real-safe mode, and there have been so many unrepeatable reiserfs
problem reports that I'm loathe to use it for real systems.  I had
exceptionally good experiences with xfs when I was admining SGI
boxes, but that's not part of the standard Linux kernel distribution,
and with no idea why, I think my managers would get grumpy with me
for using it.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110
		
	В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: