Re: MOVE LAST: why?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: MOVE LAST: why? ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors. > > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable > > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive > > across transactions. > > > > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL. > > I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords > for cursor related operations if there's no objection. Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?. I think MOVE LAST works well. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: