Re: MOVE LAST: why?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Дата
Msg-id 200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MOVE LAST: why?  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> > across transactions.
> > 
> > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.
> 
> I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
> for cursor related operations if there's no objection.

Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?.  I think MOVE
LAST works well.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A modest proposal for a FAQ addition