Michael,
Please keep your replies on-list.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:05:57AM -0700, Michael Labhard wrote:
> Thanks for the tip.
You are welcome.
> Interesting idea but I monitored the process and found it to be using
> around 200 MB of memory already,
Maybe Cygwin's heap is not quite equivalent to "monitored process
memory"?
> so I'm not sure what to make of the reference you sent.
Note that this suggestion has help many others with Cygwin out-of-memory
problems.
> Unfortunately I'm not in a position to try a test either.
Hmm...
> Appreciate the interest.
Again, you are welcome. However, it's sad that you are not even willing
to try my suggestion -- especially, since it is so easy to do so.
Nevertheless, you are the one with the itch, so you can choose to
scratch it or not.
Jason