Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> > We can always tell people who are doing embedded application work to
> > bump *down* NAMEDATALEN.
>
> Good point. Okay, I'm OK with 128 ...
Yes, good point. I think the major issue is pushing stuff out of the
cache because we have longer names. Did we see performance hit at 128?
Seems it more that just disk space.
I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance, I
can't see many people getting >64 names.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026