On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:36:43PM -0300, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> When you install freebsd or linux, is it a problem that all the
> perl modules you need have to fetched from cpan ? why can't they
> call just be part of the OS ?'
Well, not just part of the OS, but part of Perl. And after all, Perl
_does_ include a fabulous variety of built-in modules.
> likewise with dns servers, samba, apache etc.. this is a bit of a stretched
> example
> but the point is the same.
Actually, the comparison is apt. There's a reason people suggest
using your distribution's PHP or Zope or what-have-you packages,
rather than installing from source: an inexperienced user with these
packages could easily spend several days trying to figure out all the
bits to install. Obviously, such people are new users, and a
learning curve is expected. But given recent hand-wringing about the
relative "mind-share" of Postgres &c., it seems perverse to make a
new user have to find out (probably by asking on a mailing list) that
basic stuff like client libraries are a whole separate package, which
needs to be dealt with separately. It _would_ be nice, though, to be
able to get just the client stuff for sure. And maybe the separation
is worth it; I just want to be sure that people know the effect on
users.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304
x110