Re: bug in COPY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: bug in COPY
Дата
Msg-id 200207290245.g6T2jYm06821@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bug in COPY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) writes:
> > This behavior doesn't look right:
> 
> It's not, but I believe the correct point of view is that the input
> data is defective and should be rejected.  See past discussions
> leading up to the TODO item that mentions rejecting COPY input rows
> with the wrong number of fields (rather than silently filling with
> NULLs as we do now).
> 
> A subsidiary point here is that pg_atoi() explicitly takes a zero-length
> string as valid input of value 0.  I think this is quite bogus myself,
> but I don't know why that behavior was put in or whether we'd be breaking
> anything if we tightened it up.

Yea, I found the atoi zero-length behavior when I tried to clean up the
use of strtol() recently.  If you remove that behavior, the regression
tests fail.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Virus Emails
Следующее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Virus Emails