On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?
I think the better question is.. do people who has a special situation due
to their DB size want to go through all of the GENERAL mails.
Even though my DB is only about 7GB I would like to see a "performance"
list.
What would be it's charter?
A list dedicated for Large and 24 x 7 PostgreSQL installations?