> > Objections?
>
> I assume you are proposing the same privileges that you describe for a user
> table (i.e. by default only the owner (==superuser) has any access)?
>
> If so, this would break pgAdmin for any users who are not the superuser on
> their system as the majority of it's operation relies on examining the
> system catalogues. In this case I would *strongly* object.
>
> <thinks...> Surely this would also be the case for psql though - have I
> misunderstood something?
I assumed he was saying that the contents of pg_class permissions should
be interpreted the same whether it is a system table or not. He would
set the proper system table permissions so they are visible to all users
like it is now.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026