Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Дата
Msg-id 200201050032.g050Wbm18345@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> This still leaves me undecided whether to apply the first or second
> version of the LWLock patch.

I vote for the second.  Logically it makes more sense, and my guess is
that the first patch wins only if there are enough CPU's available to
run all the newly-awoken processes.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthew Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: O_DIRECT use
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem