Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

> 
> 
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > OK, here are the results on BSD/OS 4.2 on a 2-cpu system.  The first is
> > before the patch, the second after.  Both average 14tps, so the patch
> > has no negative effect on my system.  Of course, it has no positive
> > effect either.  :-)
> 
> Actually it looks slighty worse with the patch.  What about CPU usage?

For 5 clients, CPU's are 96% idle.  Load average is around 5.  Seems
totally I/O bound.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026