Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
От
Stephan Szabo
Тема
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Дата
Msg-id
20011213185555.D6476-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
cidr question (resent) "Mir S Islam" <mislam@mindspring.com>
performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction MindTerm <mindterm@yahoo.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
'IN' performance "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: 'IN' performance Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: cidr question (resent) David Stanaway <david@netventures.com.au>
Re: cidr question (resent) Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote: > I am writing a function (plpgsql) which equals to a > single transaction transaction in postgresql ( as I > known ). So I think that it is not a autocommmit mode. > > I have add following lines in postgresql.conf. > > postgresql.conf: > ==================== > shared_buffers = 640 > wal_buffers = 80 It depends on how much memory you have, but even 640 is pretty low (I think that works out to 5M). Probably a few thousand is better if you've got the ram.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления