Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Дата
Msg-id 200111242219.fAOMJ8E10396@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Yes, now I remember.  Do we support long command-line options on all
> > platforms?  I don't think so.
> 
> GUC variable assignment works on all platforms.

OK, but when we recommend, we had better tell them to start using GUC
and not long command-line options _unless_ long options are supported on
their platform.  Without that, there will be confusion.

Of course, now that we are recommending GUC, all the flags become
useless.  Kind of a circular arguement here.  :-)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?