Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
Дата
Msg-id
200111191934.fAJJYv712705@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Summary:

There have been three ideas of what octet_length() sould return:
1) compressed on-disk storage length2) byte length in server-side encoding3) byte length in client-side encoding

7.3 will do #2 for all data types.  We didn't have text type doing #2 in
7.1.X, but it appears that is the only release where octet_length(text)
returned #1.  This is the patch that made octet_length(text) return #1
in 7.1.X:
 Revision 1.62 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Wed Jul 5 23:11:35 2000 UTC (16 months, 2 weeks ago) by tgl  Changes since 1.61: +12 -20 lines Diff to previous 1.61 
 Update textin() and textout() to new fmgr style.  This is just phase one of updating the whole text datatype, but there are so dang many calls of these two routines that it seems worth a separate commit.

The open question is whether we should be doing #3.  If you want to use
octet_length to allocate space on the client side, #3 is really the
proper value, as Tom has argued.  Tatsuo is happy with #2.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000 +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
FAQ