Re: Storing a tree
| От | Micah Yoder |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Storing a tree |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20011110222800.BGNE3462.femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Storing a tree (Antonio Fiol Bonnín <fiol@w3ping.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 10 November 2001 10:08 am, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote: > If you consider the approach using multiple trees, it may have quite a good > performance even for something like a threaded message board, if you think > of each thread as a different tree. Then trees are not enormous, and so > updates would not be so slow. > > Performance will be poor, however, when updating very large trees. Ok, I guess you're right. I was thinking all messages in a large database would be in the same tree. Of course, they would all be in the same table, but it would just need a 'toplevel' field for the root message ID for the thread (which may itself need to be in another table), and with an index on that field it shouldn't be too bad. -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: