Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200108161545.f7GFjj326562@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > > OK, I see how I can do that. I thought the salt was part of the startup > > packet but I see now that it is send during the authentication request. > > I can make it longer, probably 6 characters: > > > > > 62^6 > > 56800235584 > > Why not take all 255 characters? Salt is currently defined as char[2]. Should I encode the rand() as char[4] and send that, or skip null and still encode it as char[4]. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: