Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Дата
Msg-id 10221.997980570@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Список pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Salt is currently defined as char[2].  Should I encode the rand() as
> char[4] and send that, or skip null and still encode it as char[4].

There's no need to avoid nulls here, AFAICS.  Making the salt a
fixed-length binary string seems like the best bet.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords