> and most times, those have to be merged into the source tree due to
> extensive changes anyway ... maybe we should just get rid of the use of
> pgindent altogether? its not something that I've ever seen required on
> other projects I've worked on ... in general, most projects seem to
> require that a submit'd patch from an older release be at least tested on
> the newest CVS, and with nightly snapshots being created as it is, I
> really don't see why such a requirement is a bad thing ...
In an ideal world, people would test on CVS but in reality, the patches
are usually pretty small and if they fix the problem, we apply them.
Seems like a lot of work just to avoid pgindent.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026