Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Дата
Msg-id 200103160257.VAA07079@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I was wondering if the multiple writes performed to the XLOG could be
grouped into one write().  Seems everyone agrees:fdatasync/O_DSYNC is better then plain fsync/O_SYNC

and the O_* flags are better than fsync() if we are doing only one write
before every fsync.  It seems the only open question is now often we do
multiple writes before fsync, and if that is ever faster than putting
the O_* on the file for all writes.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Sawtell
Дата:
Сообщение: FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC