Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17975.984714072@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I was wondering if the multiple writes performed to the XLOG could be
> grouped into one write().
That would require fairly major restructuring of xlog.c, which I don't
want to undertake at this point in the cycle (we're trying to push out
a release candidate, remember?). I'm not convinced it would be a huge
win anyway. It would be a win if your average transaction writes
multiple blocks' worth of XLOG ... but if your average transaction
writes less than a block then it won't help.
I think it probably is a good idea to restructure xlog.c so that it can
write more than one page at a time --- but it's not such a great idea
that I want to hold up the release any more for it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: