Bruce,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:39:05PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My point was, it seems to run quite well under Win98 on my PC. Which is
> > > > great cause I can shove it on the laptop and take it on holiday with me
> > > > to play with! :)
> > >
> > > What! That is the first I have ever heard it runs on Win98. I assume
> > > you are running Cygwin. Maybe the newer version has the stuff we need.
> > > Can you supply the cygwin version?
> >
> > Not surprisingly :-) Someone followed my page to install PostgreSQL to
> > Windows 98 last year, he told me that it runs on Win98 with no problems.
> > Because I don't have Win98, I can't test it whether it works nor not.
> > Well, I think PostgreSQL-7.0.x can run on Win98...
>
> Updated FAQ item:
>
> The database server can run on Windows NT, Win2k, and Win98 using
> Cygwin, the Cygnus Unix/NT porting library. See pgsql/doc/FAQ_MSWIN in
> the distribution or the MS Windows FAQ on our web site. We have no plan
> to do a native port to any Microsoft platform.
I would change the first sentence above to:
The database server can run on Windows NT, 2000, 9X, and Me using
Cygwin, the Red Hat Unix/Windows porting library.
But, I recommend holding off on the update until someone runs the
regression test. Especially, because of the following:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:43:25PM +0900, Yutaka tanida wrote:
> I also tried to run on Win9x with cygwin1.1.7, and succeed only with one
> connection. It seems very unstable.
Yutaka has proven himself very knowledgeable in the area of Cygwin PostgreSQL
and I think that we should heed his warning.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com