Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?

> a DEFAULTed column explicitly:
>     INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42);
> and being able to insert multiple explicit rows:
>     INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42), VALUES('bar', 99, 44);
> I think we should deal with all of these issues at once, which means
> it's not something to try to fix for 7.1.  Bruce, would you add a
> TODO item?
> 
>   * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec.

Oops, I have now added:

* Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec, disallow missing columns, allow DEFAULT

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026