> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 02:34:24AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > If libedit could be used as an alternative to readline depending on your
> > operating system setup then there's nothing wrong with that. NetBSD
> > already went the other way around and made libedit compatible with
> > readline.
>
> I had an attempt at fooling configure to look in libedit rather than
> readline, and all was OK except our libedit doesn't have "rl_special_prefixes"
> so tab-complete:105 is unhappy - I don't know what it is meant to do...
>
> Re licence business, one could argue hooks are there to use NetBSD libedit ;)
Agreed. It would be nice to have configure look for libedit or
libreadline, and use either automatically.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026