Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Larry Rosenman
Тема Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
Дата
Msg-id 20001028113853.A25462@lerami.lerctr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
* Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> [001028 11:34]:
> Applied.   Thanks.
> 
> 
> > Okay, here's my attempt at fixing the problems with parentheses in
> > subqueries.  It passes the normal 'runcheck' tests, and I've tried
> > a few simple things like 
> >   select 1 as foo union (((((select 2))))) order by foo;
> > 
> > There are a few things that it doesn't do that have been talked 
> > about here at least a little:
> > 
> > 1) It doesn't allow things like "IN(((select 1)))" -- the select
> > here has to be at the top level.  This is not new.
> > 
> > 2) It does NOT preserve the odd syntax I found when I started looking
> > at this, where a SELECT statement could begin with parentheses.  Thus,
> >   (SELECT a from foo) order by a;
> > fails.
> > 
> > I have preserved the ability, used in the regression tests, to
> > have a single select statement in what appears to be a RuleActionMulti
> > (but wasn't -- the parens were part of select_clause syntax).
> > In my version, this is a special form.
> > 
> > This may cause some discussion: I have differentiated the two kinds
> > of RuleActionMulti.  Perhaps nobody knew there were two kinds, because
> > I don't think the second form appears in the regression tests. This
> > one uses square brackets instead of parentheses, but originally was
> > otherwise the same as the one in parentheses.  In this version of
> > gram.y, the square bracket form treats SELECT statements the same
> > as the other allowed statements.  As discussed before on this list,
> > psql cannot make sense out of the results of such a thing, but an
> > application might.  And I have designs on just such an application.
> > 
> > ++ kevin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kevin O'Gorman  (805) 650-6274  mailto:kogorman@pacbell.net
> > Permanent e-mail forwarder:  mailto:Kevin.O'Gorman.64@Alum.Dartmouth.org
> > At school: mailto:kogorman@cs.ucsb.edu
> > Web: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kogorman/index.html
> > Web: http://trixie.kosman.via.ayuda.com/~kevin/index.html
> > 
> > "There is a freedom lying beyond circumstance,
> > derived from the direct intuition that life can
> > be grounded upon its absorption in what is
> > changeless amid change" 
> >    -- Alfred North Whitehead
> 
> > --- gram.y.orig    Thu Oct 26 13:13:04 2000
> > +++ gram.y    Fri Oct 27 17:37:58 2000
> > @@ -124,14 +124,15 @@
> >          DropGroupStmt, DropPLangStmt, DropSchemaStmt, DropStmt, DropTrigStmt,
> >          DropUserStmt, DropdbStmt, ExplainStmt, ExtendStmt, FetchStmt,
> >          GrantStmt, IndexStmt, InsertStmt, ListenStmt, LoadStmt, LockStmt,
> > -        NotifyStmt, OptimizableStmt, ProcedureStmt, ReindexStmt,
> > +        NotifyStmt, OptimizableStmt, ProcedureStmt
> > +        QualifiedSelectStmt, ReindexStmt,
> >          RemoveAggrStmt, RemoveFuncStmt, RemoveOperStmt, RemoveStmt,
> >          RenameStmt, RevokeStmt, RuleActionStmt, RuleActionStmtOrEmpty,
> >          RuleStmt, SelectStmt, SetSessionStmt, TransactionStmt, TruncateStmt,
> >          UnlistenStmt, UpdateStmt, VacuumStmt, VariableResetStmt,
> >          VariableSetStmt, VariableShowStmt, ViewStmt
> >  
> > -%type <node>    select_clause, select_subclause
> > +%type <node>    subquery, simple_select, select_head, set_select
> >  
> >  %type <list>    SessionList
> >  %type <node>    SessionClause
> > @@ -174,19 +175,20 @@
> >          result, OptTempTableName, relation_name_list, OptTableElementList,
> >          OptUnder, OptInherit, definition, opt_distinct,
> >          opt_with, func_args, func_args_list, func_as,
> > -        oper_argtypes, RuleActionList, RuleActionMulti,
> > +        oper_argtypes, RuleActionList, RuleActionMulti, 
> > +        RuleActionOrSelectMulti, RuleActions, RuleActionBracket,
> >          opt_column_list, columnList, opt_va_list, va_list,
> >          sort_clause, sortby_list, index_params, index_list, name_list,
> >          from_clause, from_list, opt_array_bounds,
> >          expr_list, attrs, target_list, update_target_list,
> >          def_list, opt_indirection, group_clause, TriggerFuncArgs,
> > -        opt_select_limit
> > +        opt_select_limit, select_limit
> >  
> >  %type <typnam>    func_arg, func_return, aggr_argtype
> >  
> >  %type <boolean>    opt_arg, TriggerForOpt, TriggerForType, OptTemp
> >  
> > -%type <list>    for_update_clause, update_list
> > +%type <list>    opt_for_update_clause, for_update_clause, update_list
> >  %type <boolean>    opt_all
> >  %type <boolean>    opt_table
> >  %type <boolean>    opt_chain, opt_trans
> > @@ -2689,7 +2691,7 @@
> >  RuleStmt:  CREATE RULE name AS
> >             { QueryIsRule=TRUE; }
> >             ON event TO event_object where_clause
> > -           DO opt_instead RuleActionList
> > +           DO opt_instead RuleActions
> >                  {
> >                      RuleStmt *n = makeNode(RuleStmt);
> >                      n->rulename = $3;
> > @@ -2702,17 +2704,42 @@
> >                  }
> >          ;
> >  
> > -RuleActionList:  NOTHING                { $$ = NIL; }
> > -        | SelectStmt                    { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > -        | RuleActionStmt                { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > -        | '[' RuleActionMulti ']'        { $$ = $2; }
> > -        | '(' RuleActionMulti ')'        { $$ = $2; } 
> > +RuleActions:  NOTHING                { $$ = NIL; }
> > +        | RuleActionStmt            { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > +        | SelectStmt                { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > +        | RuleActionList
> > +        | RuleActionBracket
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +/* LEGACY: Version 7.0 did not like SELECT statements in these lists,
> > + * but because of an oddity in the syntax for select_clause, allowed
> > + * certain forms like "DO INSTEAD (select 1)", and this is used in
> > + * the regression tests.
> > + * Here, we're allowing just one SELECT in parentheses, to preserve
> > + * any such expectations, and make the regression tests work.
> > + *               ++ KO'G
> > + */
> > +RuleActionList:        '(' RuleActionMulti ')'        { $$ = $2; } 
> > +        | '(' SelectStmt ')'    { $$ = makeList1($2); }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +/* An undocumented feature, bracketed lists are allowed to contain
> > + * SELECT statements on the same basis as the others.  Before this,
> > + * they were the same as parenthesized lists, and did not allow
> > + * SelectStmts.  Anybody know why they were here originally?  Or if
> > + * they're in the regression tests at all?
> > + *               ++ KO'G
> > + */
> > +RuleActionBracket:    '[' RuleActionOrSelectMulti ']'        { $$ = $2; } 
> >          ;
> >  
> >  /* the thrashing around here is to discard "empty" statements... */
> >  RuleActionMulti:  RuleActionMulti ';' RuleActionStmtOrEmpty
> >                  { if ($3 != (Node *) NULL)
> > -                    $$ = lappend($1, $3);
> > +                    if ($1 != NIL)
> > +                        $$ = lappend($1, $3);
> > +                    else
> > +                        $$ = makeList1($3);
> >                    else
> >                      $$ = $1;
> >                  }
> > @@ -2724,6 +2751,31 @@
> >                  }
> >          ;
> >  
> > +RuleActionOrSelectMulti: RuleActionOrSelectMulti ';' RuleActionStmtOrEmpty
> > +                { if ($3 != (Node *) NULL)
> > +                    if ($1 != NIL)
> > +                        $$ = lappend($1, $3);
> > +                    else
> > +                        $$ = makeList1($3);
> > +                  else
> > +                    $$ = $1;
> > +                }
> > +        | RuleActionOrSelectMulti ';' SelectStmt
> > +                { if ($1 != NIL)
> > +                        $$ = lappend($1, $3);
> > +                  else
> > +                        $$ = makeList1($3);
> > +                }
> > +        | RuleActionStmtOrEmpty
> > +                { if ($1 != (Node *) NULL)
> > +                    $$ = makeList1($1);
> > +                  else
> > +                    $$ = NIL;
> > +                }
> > +        | SelectStmt        { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +
> >  RuleActionStmt:    InsertStmt
> >          | UpdateStmt
> >          | DeleteStmt
> > @@ -3289,7 +3341,12 @@
> >   * However, this is not checked by the grammar; parse analysis must check it.
> >   */
> >  
> > -SelectStmt:      select_clause sort_clause for_update_clause opt_select_limit
> > +SelectStmt:    QualifiedSelectStmt
> > +        | select_head
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +QualifiedSelectStmt:
> > +          select_head sort_clause opt_for_update_clause opt_select_limit
> >              {
> >                  SelectStmt *n = findLeftmostSelect($1);
> >  
> > @@ -3299,34 +3356,35 @@
> >                  n->limitCount = nth(1, $4);
> >                  $$ = $1;
> >              }
> > -        ;
> > -
> > -/* This rule parses Select statements that can appear within set operations,
> > - * including UNION, INTERSECT and EXCEPT.  '(' and ')' can be used to specify
> > - * the ordering of the set operations.  Without '(' and ')' we want the
> > - * operations to be ordered per the precedence specs at the head of this file.
> > - *
> > - * Since parentheses around SELECTs also appear in the expression grammar,
> > - * there is a parse ambiguity if parentheses are allowed at the top level of a
> > - * select_clause: are the parens part of the expression or part of the select?
> > - * We separate select_clause into two levels to resolve this: select_clause
> > - * can have top-level parentheses, select_subclause cannot.
> > - *
> > - * Note that sort clauses cannot be included at this level --- a sort clause
> > - * can only appear at the end of the complete Select, and it will be handled
> > - * by the topmost SelectStmt rule.  Likewise FOR UPDATE and LIMIT.
> > - */
> > -select_clause: '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | select_head for_update_clause opt_select_limit
> >              {
> > -                $$ = $2; 
> > +                SelectStmt *n = findLeftmostSelect($1);
> > +
> > +                n->sortClause = NULL;
> > +                n->forUpdate = $2;
> > +                n->limitOffset = nth(0, $3);
> > +                n->limitCount = nth(1, $3);
> > +                $$ = $1;
> >              }
> > -        | select_subclause
> > +        | select_head select_limit
> >              {
> > -                $$ = $1; 
> > +                SelectStmt *n = findLeftmostSelect($1);
> > +
> > +                n->sortClause = NULL;
> > +                n->forUpdate = NULL;
> > +                n->limitOffset = nth(0, $2);
> > +                n->limitCount = nth(1, $2);
> > +                $$ = $1;
> >              }
> >          ;
> >  
> > -select_subclause: SELECT opt_distinct target_list
> > +subquery:    '(' subquery ')'            { $$ = $2; }
> > +        | '(' QualifiedSelectStmt ')'    { $$ = $2; }
> > +        | '(' set_select ')'            { $$ = $2; }
> > +        | simple_select                    { $$ = $1; }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +simple_select: SELECT opt_distinct target_list
> >               result from_clause where_clause
> >               group_clause having_clause
> >                  {
> > @@ -3341,7 +3399,13 @@
> >                      n->havingClause = $8;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | select_clause UNION opt_all select_clause
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +select_head: simple_select            { $$ = $1; }
> > +        |    set_select                { $$ = $1; }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +set_select: select_head UNION opt_all subquery
> >              {    
> >                  SetOperationStmt *n = makeNode(SetOperationStmt);
> >                  n->op = SETOP_UNION;
> > @@ -3350,7 +3414,7 @@
> >                  n->rarg = $4;
> >                  $$ = (Node *) n;
> >              }
> > -        | select_clause INTERSECT opt_all select_clause
> > +        | select_head INTERSECT opt_all subquery
> >              {
> >                  SetOperationStmt *n = makeNode(SetOperationStmt);
> >                  n->op = SETOP_INTERSECT;
> > @@ -3359,7 +3423,7 @@
> >                  n->rarg = $4;
> >                  $$ = (Node *) n;
> >              }
> > -        | select_clause EXCEPT opt_all select_clause
> > +        | select_head EXCEPT opt_all subquery
> >              {
> >                  SetOperationStmt *n = makeNode(SetOperationStmt);
> >                  n->op = SETOP_EXCEPT;
> > @@ -3424,7 +3488,6 @@
> >          ;
> >  
> >  sort_clause:  ORDER BY sortby_list                { $$ = $3; }
> > -        | /*EMPTY*/                                { $$ = NIL; }
> >          ;
> >  
> >  sortby_list:  sortby                            { $$ = makeList1($1); }
> > @@ -3446,7 +3509,7 @@
> >          ;
> >  
> >  
> > -opt_select_limit:    LIMIT select_limit_value ',' select_offset_value
> > +select_limit:    LIMIT select_limit_value ',' select_offset_value
> >              { $$ = makeList2($4, $2); }
> >          | LIMIT select_limit_value OFFSET select_offset_value
> >              { $$ = makeList2($4, $2); }
> > @@ -3456,6 +3519,9 @@
> >              { $$ = makeList2($2, $4); }
> >          | OFFSET select_offset_value
> >              { $$ = makeList2($2, NULL); }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +opt_select_limit: select_limit    { $$ = $1; }
> >          | /* EMPTY */
> >              { $$ = makeList2(NULL, NULL); }
> >          ;
> > @@ -3555,6 +3621,9 @@
> >  
> >  for_update_clause:  FOR UPDATE update_list        { $$ = $3; }
> >          | FOR READ ONLY                            { $$ = NULL; }
> > +        ;
> > +
> > +opt_for_update_clause:    for_update_clause        { $$ = $1; }
> >          | /* EMPTY */                            { $$ = NULL; }
> >          ;
> >  
> > @@ -3598,7 +3667,7 @@
> >                      $1->name = $2;
> >                      $$ = (Node *) $1;
> >                  }
> > -        | '(' select_subclause ')' alias_clause
> > +        | '(' SelectStmt ')' alias_clause
> >                  {
> >                      RangeSubselect *n = makeNode(RangeSubselect);
> >                      n->subquery = $2;
> > @@ -4134,7 +4203,7 @@
> >   * Define row_descriptor to allow yacc to break the reduce/reduce conflict
> >   *  with singleton expressions.
> >   */
> > -row_expr: '(' row_descriptor ')' IN '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +row_expr: '(' row_descriptor ')' IN '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = $2;
> > @@ -4144,7 +4213,7 @@
> >                      n->subselect = $6;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | '(' row_descriptor ')' NOT IN '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | '(' row_descriptor ')' NOT IN '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = $2;
> > @@ -4154,7 +4223,7 @@
> >                      n->subselect = $7;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | '(' row_descriptor ')' all_Op sub_type '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | '(' row_descriptor ')' all_Op sub_type '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = $2;
> > @@ -4167,7 +4236,7 @@
> >                      n->subselect = $7;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | '(' row_descriptor ')' all_Op '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | '(' row_descriptor ')' all_Op '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = $2;
> > @@ -4498,7 +4567,7 @@
> >                          $$ = n;
> >                      }
> >                  }
> > -        | a_expr all_Op sub_type '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | a_expr all_Op sub_type '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = makeList1($1);
> > @@ -4894,7 +4963,7 @@
> >                      n->agg_distinct = FALSE;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = NIL;
> > @@ -4904,7 +4973,7 @@
> >                      n->subselect = $2;
> >                      $$ = (Node *)n;
> >                  }
> > -        | EXISTS '(' select_subclause ')'
> > +        | EXISTS '(' SelectStmt ')'
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->lefthand = NIL;
> > @@ -5003,7 +5072,7 @@
> >                  { $$ = $1; }
> >          ;
> >  
> > -in_expr:  select_subclause
> > +in_expr:  SelectStmt
> >                  {
> >                      SubLink *n = makeNode(SubLink);
> >                      n->subselect = $1;
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb