Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200002280828.DAA19846@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which > > > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either > > > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or > > > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label. > > > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it. > > Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0. But we just required initdb for lztext. If we need another initdb later, maybe we should do it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: