> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> ERROR: ALTER TABLE / DROP CONSTRAINT is not implemented
>
> > I thought that was going in. According to Marc, if it sufficiently
> > warned users, and required them to type it twice, it would do Peter's
> > alter table code. Perhaps Peter decided to wait for 7.1?
>
> I thought the rest of us beat him up until he took it out ;-)
Yes, he was badly beaten up about it, but I felt that the code as is was
pretty good, considering how bad CLUSTER is. If people are told the
limitations, it could be a win.
I felt that the more advanced features like not using 2x disk space were
quite hard to implement, considering the other TODO items. Marc agreed
and was going to e-mail him to tell him that with proper user warning,
we wanted the patch.
Do people disagree?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026