Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Дата
Msg-id 200002190038.TAA20900@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I believe it is Interbase that does not support the -- comment.

> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > 
> > I've since seen the article in the latest issue of PCWeek. The article
> > was not at all clear on the *specific* features which would disqualify
> > Postgres from having SQL92 entry level compliance (for most commercial
> > RDBMSes this is the only level they attain), and I was amused to note
> > that although InterBase was lauded for SQL92 compliance, the author
> > did encourage them to consider supporting the SQL92 comment delimiter
> > ("--") in their next release :))
> 
> Why does PostgreSQL _not_ support the -- comment delimiter ?
> 
> Is there something complicated to supporting it in parser ?
> 
> IMNSHO it would require only a few lines in gram.y
> 
> Does supporting user-defined operators interfere ?
> 
> I assume we could comfortably disallow -- as a possible operator (one 
> can't input it from interactive psql anyway)
> 
> --------------
> Hannu
> 
> ************
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Следующее
От: Roberto Cornacchia
Дата:
Сообщение: Generalized Top Queries on PostgreSQL