Re: [INTERFACES] Forms too complex or to large in pgaccess?
От | R.Hoellwarth@t-online.de (Ronald Hoellwarth) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Forms too complex or to large in pgaccess? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000116122614.A25949@beehive.hoellwarth обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Forms too complex or to large in pgaccess? (Constantin Teodorescu <teo@flex.ro>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Am Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 09:53:01AM +0200 schrieb Constantin Teodorescu: > But, instead of finding them as you show us (with datacontrols) , why > don't you use this simple variant: > > Scripts::execute "kz_bind" > > Starting with version 0.98, PgAccess defines those namespaces (Forms, > Scripts, ...) that implement the simple commands "Open", "Execute", > "Design". > > Please check if it works for you and drop me a note! Well. I commented the above code and added yours. As far as I see there is no difference. When I remember it right, I thought about this very short and simple solution but didn't really know if there will be problems regarding the namespaces - because: I HAD such problems but managed to solve them. The somewhat more complex code I used assured me that the code in the script will be executed as if it was a part of the code wherein it is sourced. It was "my very own solution" which I was able to follow and understand. By that way I learned more about namespaces and datacontrols. As your version is definitly the shorter one I think it's the right way to sail around the problem. > Teo thanks for the hint and for the tool! ronald -- Ronald Höllwarth Registrierter Linux User #132865 <hoellwarth@yahoo.com> GPG - SchluesselID 0x2F7A041A
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: