Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Дата
Msg-id 200001160644.BAA09781@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have applied a patch for this one.
> 
> Right, you saw the parser_typecast mistake.  But the problem of doing
> it properly for non-constant input to the CAST is still open.
> 

Yes, and constants with cases in SELECT INTO are broken too.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Следующее
От: Kristofer Munn
Дата:
Сообщение: Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc...