Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200001050456.XAA04152@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to rename timestamp to datetime because > > datetime is the ANSI name? Just asking. > > timestamp is the SQL92 name for the date+time data type. datetime was > a name concocted by me to avoid conflicting with other possible > standard names when I first implemented the "new and improved" > date/time types. Am I missing something in my recollection?? I had refered to datetime in my book, thinking that was the standard name. I now see it is TIMESTAMP. Good thing someone asked about this. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: