Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
От
Guillaume Smet
Тема
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Дата
Msg-id
1d4e0c10712260920g7a440fam4363a886f60fa700@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances (Guillaume Smet)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain@dalibo.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
On Dec 26, 2007 4:41 PM, Guillaume Smet wrote: > Then I decided to perform read-only tests using -S option (pgbench -S > -s 100 -c 16 -t 30000 -U postgres bench). And still the same > behaviour: > shared_buffers=64MB : 20k tps > shared_buffers=1024MB : 8k tps Some more information. If I strace the backends during the test, the test is faster with shared_buffers=1024MB and I have less system calls (less read and less lseek). A quick cut | uniq | sort gives me: With 64MB: 12548 semop 160039 sendto 160056 recvfrom 294289 read 613338 lseek With 1024MB: 11396 semop 129947 read 160039 sendto 160056 recvfrom 449584 lseek -- Guillaume
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления